Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Oscars: haro on the speech of thanks endless, tasteless – Le Figaro

The Academy asks appointed to transmit in advance the names of people they would like to quote for a win to boost their 45 seconds speaking time and give a little substance at a ceremony in the long term.

This is an initiative that Caesar would do well to emulate. The Oscars were announced Monday during their traditional lunch named a new speech material label. The winners who will go up on stage on February 28 are requested not to turn their thanks in a litany of names.

No more endless tributes and unimaginative parents, spouses, children, workers, fellow actors and director and producers … All of those named 88th Academy Awards will be submitted beforehand to the Academy the list of people that ‘they want to salute if they win. Their names will scroll like on a current string in a banner at the bottom of the screen while the winner will be on the podium and will use 45 seconds regulatory Speaking to hold about more personal and profound.

This is not only to make them more memorable speaking but also boost a ceremony, like all awards, tends to pull in length. An example reprennant victory in 2009 Kate Winslet for The Reader was broadcast.

The winners will they play the game? See, but they will have no more excuses if they forget, overcome with emotion, mentioning their spouse. A flaw spied by scandals at newspapers who see the sign of an impending separation.

The idea came to the organizers after the Oscars 2015, Dana Perry, honored for his short film Crisis Hotline: Veterans day 1 , was interrupted by the orchestra when she spoke of the suicide of her son, tragedy had driven to engage in the making of this film

<. figure class="photo-fig fig-media-full" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject" readability="- 23.5"> class Photo of xe9 named & #; s Oscars 2016.

Class picture named the 2016 Oscars Photo Credits:

during the meal the President of the Academy Cheryl Boone Isaacs who has already announced a historic reform of the composition of the jury Awards, has again alluded to the lack of diversity of thought 2016 no selected actor and director from minority . “There is an elephant in the room and I asked him to leave,” she began. Producers of the ceremony have promised that their live show of categories animations presenters reflect the richness of American society.

The subject was clearly in the minds of many guests. Thus, Sylvester Stallone, vying for the trophy for Best Supporting Actor for his performance in Creed had considered boycotting the ceremony. “Sly”, 69, asked their opinion to the director, the African-American filmmaker Ryan Coogler and his partner Michael B. Jordan. “When the controversy arose I remember discussing with Ryan:” How do you want to handle this? Because I think you’re really the reason why I was chosen, ‘ “he recounted. “Michael Jordan, every time I looked in his eyes as an actor, I thought it made me better. I think he should have a lot more respect, much more attention. Coogler said “go ahead, will represent the film and you think you deserve.” I still hope that things will change in the future. “

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment