Irina Ionesco failed to obtain judgment in its favor, while Friday 7 August that she asked to be removed passages concerning her private life Eva sound novel son Simon Liberati, the stock editions. She claimed that seven passages evoking his health, sex life and his incestuous origin of the novel had to be removed in order to safeguard his private life.
Nothing less while the photographer had been distributed and paid for broadcasting pictures of his naked girl, whereas it was only 4 years. His daughter Eva was the object of his photographic plates sulfur through adolescence.
Irina Ionesco finally dismissed and face Simon Liberati Stock
In addition, the judges considered that the life of Irina had already been widely disclosed, including an autobiographical novel published in 2003, The eye of the doll and in a film of his daughter Eva, my little princess in 2011 recounting the details of his life “Lolita” under the influence of her mother when she was a minor. Irina Ionesco invoked the freedom of artistic creation.
In addition, the novel is already in press, the publishing house would have had a lot of hassle to clear passages. The output of the novel will therefore be as scheduled on August 19, next judges concluded.
The 85 year old photographer was additionally ordered to compensate the writer and editions of Stock 3,000 euros. She, who demanded 40,000 for infringement of privacy. How, indeed, can a person ask to be compensated for a snag her privacy while she same, disregards the intimate lives of others, in this case his own daughter and minor, in addition? Thus, the sprinkler itself is watered by his own medicine. According to the judges, it is a question of balance.
>
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment