“ This documentary is purely dependent, hateful, caricature, it is a series of cons-truths and treats at any time the contents of the actions of François Mitterrand ,” said AFP Jack Lang, who was Minister of Culture during the two positions held by former President of the Republic.
“ I am doubly surprised, first because William Karel has made some good documentaries and also because Arte is renowned for its intellectual rigor, especially chaired by Véronique Cayla , “continued the current President of the Arab World Institute (IMA), which has viewed the documentary before its release.
He said he had sent a letter about it to the president of Arte. Contacted by AFP Monday, the chain said it did not wish to react for now, has not yet received this mail.
Jack Lang “ has the right course to dislike, but then to send a letter to Arte to complain, it’s like back in the days of the ORTF ” , reacted with William Katel Liberation.
“ I’ve experienced that with Christian Estrosi and Nadine Morano when my film on Sarkozy, I expected and I was almost amused “, has -t he said.
“ I liked Jack Lang who spoke to Bob Wilson, Patrice Chéreau, who embodied freedom of expression … It’s not the same man. He is blinded “, has he still felt.
The director notes that if Jack Lang believes that there are cons-truths in his film, it does cite any.
“ What else does our love ” William Karel “ revisits accurately two seven chiaroscuro of the first socialist president, who promised, citing Rimbaud, to change life + + , “says Arte on its website.
No comments:
Post a Comment